CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.392 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.346 ± 0.063 > 0.151 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.178 > 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.863 > 0.135
Total TP 931 > 910
Total TN 2965200 > 2959560
Total FP 179 < 5926
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 786
Total FP INCONS 130 < 5023
Total FP COMP 31 < 117
Total FN 4286 < 4307
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 931
Total TN 2965200
Total FP 179
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 130
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 4286
Total Scores
MCC 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.346 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.178
Positive Predictive Value 0.863
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.29 0.08 1.00 9 62472 0 0 0 0 101
ASE_00185 0.37 0.14 1.00 18 73518 0 0 0 0 110
ASE_00190 0.29 0.11 0.77 10 45438 6 0 3 3 80
ASE_00221 0.36 0.15 0.89 17 64601 2 0 2 0 100
ASE_00228 0.41 0.19 0.89 16 46953 3 0 2 1 70
ASE_00229 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 42479 0 0 0 0 80
ASE_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 47895 0 0 0 0 96
ASE_00234 0.38 0.18 0.82 23 75438 6 0 5 1 106
ASE_00238 0.18 0.04 0.71 5 64254 2 0 2 0 109
ASE_00248 0.72 0.55 0.94 63 62414 5 0 4 1 51
ASE_00254 0.54 0.30 0.96 25 36830 1 0 1 0 57
ASE_00255 0.67 0.55 0.84 71 74606 16 1 13 2 59
ASE_00257 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 51040 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00267 0.46 0.22 1.00 19 45131 1 0 0 1 69
ASE_00270 0.30 0.10 0.87 13 72375 2 0 2 0 115
ASE_00274 0.18 0.04 0.80 4 55606 1 0 1 0 99
ASE_00277 0.27 0.10 0.75 9 48193 3 0 3 0 82
ASE_00279 0.24 0.06 1.00 6 53295 0 0 0 0 95
ASE_00285 0.50 0.27 0.94 33 68971 3 0 2 1 89
ASE_00287 0.18 0.04 0.80 4 54941 1 0 1 0 99
ASE_00294 0.47 0.22 0.97 38 114442 1 1 0 0 133
ASE_00298 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 67528 0 0 0 0 113
ASE_00318 0.55 0.32 0.95 38 80160 4 0 2 2 80
ASE_00335 0.65 0.46 0.93 53 75409 9 0 4 5 63
ASE_00340 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 3 0 0 3 85
ASE_00367 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 86
ASE_00370 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41905 0 0 0 0 84
ASE_00372 0.18 0.04 0.80 4 51998 1 0 1 0 96
ASE_00376 0.16 0.04 0.67 4 56947 2 0 2 0 101
ASE_00377 0.24 0.07 0.80 8 57620 3 0 2 1 99
ASE_00386 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 50403 0 0 0 0 96
ASE_00393 0.39 0.16 0.94 15 47879 1 0 1 0 78
ASE_00412 0.19 0.08 0.47 8 58294 10 0 9 1 97
ASE_00413 0.33 0.12 0.91 10 44540 1 0 1 0 71
ASE_00416 0.40 0.18 0.88 23 77395 6 1 2 3 104
ASE_00422 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00428 0.43 0.19 0.96 24 76611 2 1 0 1 101
ASE_00430 0.49 0.24 1.00 23 46948 0 0 0 0 74
ASE_00437 0.22 0.10 0.52 13 79376 12 1 11 0 122
ASE_00451 0.47 0.24 0.91 30 70843 3 1 2 0 95
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
TMR_00123 0.36 0.13 1.00 13 66417 0 0 0 0 88
TMR_00399 0.39 0.26 0.59 24 64939 17 5 12 0 70
TMR_00443 0.64 0.50 0.81 52 67097 12 1 11 0 52
TMR_00469 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 64603 0 0 0 0 83
TMR_00519 0.47 0.23 0.96 22 63167 1 1 0 0 73
TMR_00528 0.27 0.07 1.00 7 63183 0 0 0 0 90
TMR_00571 0.63 0.46 0.85 46 60672 11 1 7 3 53
TMR_00584 0.65 0.46 0.92 45 61026 6 0 4 2 52
TMR_00703 0.37 0.25 0.54 25 67482 21 3 18 0 74

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 910
Total TN 2959560
Total FP 5926
Total FP CONTRA 786
Total FP INCONS 5023
Total FP COMP 117
Total FN 4307
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.151 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.135
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.