CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.862 > 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.020 > 0.685 ± 0.312
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.586
Positive Predictive Value 0.990 > 0.757
Total TP 100 > 78
Total TN 14632 > 14630
Total FP 3 < 26
Total FP CONTRA 1 = 1
Total FP INCONS 0 < 24
Total FP COMP 2 > 1
Total FN 33 < 55
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 14632
Total FP 3
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 33
Total Scores
MCC 0.862
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.020
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.990
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 78
Total TN 14630
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.312
Sensitivity 0.586
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.39 0.36 0.43 9 3300 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.43 0.38 0.50 13 4345 13 1 12 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.