CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Alterna
MCC 0.774 > 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.060 > 0.492 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.642 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.936 > 0.529
Total TP 219 > 155
Total TN 38743 > 38684
Total FP 17 < 155
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 25
Total FP INCONS 10 < 113
Total FP COMP 2 < 17
Total FN 122 < 186
P-value 2.39162260866e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 219
Total TN 38743
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.936
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.75 0.61 0.93 14 2686 1 0 1 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2258 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01020 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 2259 1 0 0 1 4
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00632 0.74 0.64 0.86 18 4074 3 2 1 0 10
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 38684
Total FP 155
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 186
Total Scores
MCC 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.529
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 21 3 18 0 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 2258 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01020 0.76 0.70 0.84 16 2259 4 2 1 1 7
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
RFA_00632 0.24 0.25 0.23 7 4065 23 3 20 0 21
RFA_00636 0.50 0.46 0.54 13 3981 13 3 8 2 15
RFA_00767 0.54 0.50 0.60 9 1876 6 2 4 0 9
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 9 0 6 3 10
RFA_00769 0.38 0.39 0.39 7 1935 11 2 9 0 11
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 19 3 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 11 0 9 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.