CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.717 > 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.074 > 0.640 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.584 > 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.883 > 0.716
Total TP 136 > 131
Total TN 46930 > 46901
Total FP 20 < 57
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 15 < 41
Total FP COMP 2 < 5
Total FN 97 < 102
P-value 7.20029949774e-10

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 46930
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.717
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.584
Positive Predictive Value 0.883
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.74 0.65 0.86 42 27212 9 0 7 2 23
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 46901
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.