CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.632 > 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.036 > 0.104 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.466 > 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.858 < 0.962
Total TP 2126 > 101
Total TN 2862142 < 2864514
Total FP 472 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 3
Total FP INCONS 305 > 1
Total FP COMP 121 > 1
Total FN 2440 < 4465
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2126
Total TN 2862142
Total FP 472
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 305
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 2440
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.858
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.77 0.60 0.98 45 34145 5 0 1 4 30
ASE_00002 0.82 0.77 0.88 56 35447 11 1 7 3 17
ASE_00009 0.56 0.34 0.92 23 26081 3 0 2 1 44
ASE_00014 0.55 0.35 0.86 37 54242 6 1 5 0 69
ASE_00116 0.48 0.23 1.00 15 31611 2 0 0 2 51
ASE_00120 0.67 0.53 0.85 50 46912 9 1 8 0 44
ASE_00121 0.57 0.39 0.82 36 45106 8 1 7 0 56
ASE_00145 0.64 0.50 0.81 56 70056 13 0 13 0 55
ASE_00148 0.49 0.27 0.89 41 112529 5 0 5 0 113
ASE_00154 0.60 0.43 0.85 46 65287 8 0 8 0 61
ASE_00155 0.56 0.35 0.88 50 93471 7 0 7 0 92
ASE_00187 0.65 0.44 0.94 51 68581 5 0 3 2 64
ASE_00196 0.65 0.47 0.90 35 31587 4 0 4 0 40
ASE_00205 0.68 0.54 0.84 49 45998 12 0 9 3 41
ASE_00209 0.63 0.45 0.87 40 43025 6 1 5 0 48
ASE_00210 0.79 0.69 0.90 45 27211 5 0 5 0 20
ASE_00213 0.85 0.77 0.94 51 27207 5 0 3 2 15
ASE_00222 0.52 0.31 0.86 49 112044 8 0 8 0 108
ASE_00346 0.52 0.41 0.67 40 48145 24 3 17 4 57
ASE_00359 0.44 0.23 0.86 18 42757 3 0 3 0 62
ASE_00360 0.64 0.52 0.79 34 29360 9 1 8 0 31
ASE_00417 0.51 0.43 0.61 43 54545 28 1 26 1 57
ASE_00418 0.42 0.33 0.53 25 38734 23 1 21 1 50
CRW_00013 0.62 0.42 0.92 48 103688 4 0 4 0 67
CRW_00016 0.70 0.50 0.97 60 77359 2 0 2 0 60
CRW_00610 0.66 0.46 0.95 37 36276 2 0 2 0 44
CRW_00613 0.74 0.55 1.00 43 34937 0 0 0 0 35
CRW_00614 0.21 0.18 0.25 10 121731 73 7 23 43 47
CRW_00618 0.38 0.25 0.58 15 56254 20 1 10 9 46
CRW_00633 0.64 0.42 0.98 45 63500 2 1 0 1 61
CRW_00634 0.69 0.54 0.88 51 64562 7 1 6 0 43
CRW_00670 0.69 0.50 0.95 60 70062 3 0 3 0 60
CRW_00671 0.66 0.48 0.92 56 62774 5 1 4 0 61
CRW_00672 0.69 0.50 0.96 55 72333 3 0 2 1 56
CRW_00674 0.76 0.57 1.00 71 83365 1 0 0 1 53
CRW_00676 0.73 0.55 0.98 63 93464 3 0 1 2 52
CRW_00692 0.82 0.70 0.95 63 68569 3 0 3 0 27
PDB_00005 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 939 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00716 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2684 12 0 12 0 18
PDB_00827 0.73 0.54 0.98 44 26983 2 0 1 1 37
PDB_01092 0.74 0.60 0.91 31 10119 5 0 3 2 21
RFA_00597 0.50 0.25 1.00 27 97876 3 0 0 3 82
RFA_00598 0.58 0.34 1.00 34 84632 5 0 0 5 67
RFA_00599 0.65 0.46 0.91 51 101419 10 3 2 5 60
RFA_00600 0.51 0.29 0.91 29 120263 7 0 3 4 71
RFA_00601 0.86 0.82 0.91 93 99133 20 3 6 11 21
RFA_00602 0.85 0.80 0.90 93 101372 20 3 7 10 23
RFA_00632 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 4068 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 2864514
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 4465
Total Scores
MCC 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.104 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34191 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 73
ASE_00009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 26106 0 0 0 0 67
ASE_00014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54285 0 0 0 0 106
ASE_00116 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00120 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00121 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45150 0 0 0 0 92
ASE_00145 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 111
ASE_00148 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 112575 0 0 0 0 154
ASE_00154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 65341 0 0 0 0 107
ASE_00155 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 142
ASE_00187 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 115
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00205 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 90
ASE_00209 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 88
ASE_00210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00213 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00222 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 112101 0 0 0 0 157
ASE_00346 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 48205 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00359 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 42778 0 0 0 0 80
ASE_00360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 29403 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00418 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 38781 0 0 0 0 75
CRW_00013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 103740 0 0 0 0 115
CRW_00016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 77421 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00610 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36315 0 0 0 0 81
CRW_00613 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34980 0 0 0 0 78
CRW_00614 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 121771 0 0 0 0 57
CRW_00618 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56280 0 0 0 0 61
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64620 0 0 0 0 94
CRW_00670 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115
CRW_00692 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 90
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00827 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27028 0 0 0 0 81
PDB_01092 0.77 0.63 0.94 33 10118 3 1 1 1 19
RFA_00597 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 97903 0 0 0 0 109
RFA_00598 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 84666 0 0 0 0 101
RFA_00599 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 111
RFA_00600 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 120295 0 0 0 0 100
RFA_00601 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 99235 0 0 0 0 114
RFA_00602 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 116
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16
RFA_00809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.