CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	ContextFold		Murlet(seed)
MCC	0.697	>	0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.514 ± 0.117	>	0.476 ± 0.098
Sensitivity	0.636	>	0.492
Positive Predictive Value	0.765	>	0.694
Total TP	457	>	354
Total TN	1015022	<	1015109
Total FP	160	<	180
Total FP CONTRA	22	>	6
Total FP INCONS	118	<	150
Total FP COMP	20	<	24
Total FN	262	<	365
P-value	7.21563533328e-09

Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).

Total Scores
MCC	0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.514 ± 0.117
Sensitivity	0.636
Positive Predictive Value	0.765
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
CRW_01343	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.76	0.89	328	977531	59	6	36	17	106
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.36	0.50	5	936	5	0	5	0	9
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2687	14	0	14	0	23
PDB_01092	glmS links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.63	0.77	33	10110	12	1	9	2	19
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.25	0.25	0.26	7	4068	20	1	19	0	21
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.43	0.63	12	3986	7	0	7	0	16
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.56	0.63	10	1875	6	3	3	0	8
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	1876	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.56	0.56	10	1935	8	4	4	0	8
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	2001	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.56	0.63	10	1937	6	1	5	0	8
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	1938	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00808	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.44	0.78	7	2007	2	0	2	0	9
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.31	0.50	5	2135	6	0	5	1	11

Total Scores
MCC	0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.476 ± 0.098
Sensitivity	0.492
Positive Predictive Value	0.694
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
CRW_01343	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.68	263	977515	145	6	117	22	171
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.29	1.00	4	942	2	0	0	2	10
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.13	0.43	3	2694	4	0	4	0	20
PDB_01092	glmS links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.48	1.00	25	10128	0	0	0	0	27
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.21	0.11	0.43	3	4088	4	0	4	0	25
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.21	0.11	0.43	3	3998	4	0	4	0	25
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.33	0.67	6	1882	3	0	3	0	12
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.28	0.63	5	1883	3	0	3	0	13
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.44	0.73	8	1942	3	0	3	0	10
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.44	0.73	8	2005	3	0	3	0	10
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.28	0.63	5	1945	3	0	3	0	13
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.33	0.67	6	1944	3	0	3	0	12
RFA_00808	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.56	1.00	9	2007	0	0	0	0	7
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.38	0.67	6	2136	3	0	3	0	10

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.