CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RDfolder
MCC 0.515 > 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.086 > 0.545 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.567 < 0.609
Total TP 416 > 377
Total TN 76864 < 76979
Total FP 331 > 245
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 22
Total FP INCONS 291 > 220
Total FP COMP 13 > 3
Total FN 457 < 496
P-value 0.0481694229406

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 416
Total TN 76864
Total FP 331
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 291
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 457
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.567
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.20 0.20 4 1015 16 2 14 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.25 0.25 0.29 4 616 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 486 10 2 8 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1996 8 1 7 0 9
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 2259 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 1071 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 19 0 18 1 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4146 40 0 40 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 2259 3 1 1 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.29 0.30 0.30 6 1108 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01194 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 0 11 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1158 5 3 2 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 1811 5 1 4 0 11
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 364 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 0 19 0 17
RFA_00636 0.60 0.64 0.56 18 3973 14 4 10 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 0 8 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 377
Total TN 76979
Total FP 245
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 220
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 496
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 430 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.75 0.61 0.92 22 4162 2 2 0 0 14
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.48 0.37 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00571 0.39 0.36 0.43 9 3300 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00713 - 0.46 0.43 0.50 9 1998 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 18 1 16 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 4726 23 0 23 0 37
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - 0.37 0.35 0.41 14 4152 20 0 20 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.37 0.33 0.41 7 2468 10 0 10 0 14
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.43 0.38 0.50 13 4345 13 1 12 0 21
PDB_01194 - 0.52 0.33 0.83 5 490 1 1 0 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1166 10 0 10 0 19
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1817 13 0 13 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 2 4 0 15
RFA_00632 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 4074 6 1 5 0 13
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1882 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.