CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.797 > 0.439
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.114 > 0.440 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.801 > 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.797 > 0.563
Total TP 145 > 63
Total TN 21585 < 21655
Total FP 44 < 49
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 3
Total FP INCONS 26 < 46
Total FP COMP 7 > 0
Total FN 36 < 118
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 145
Total TN 21585
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 36
Total Scores
MCC 0.797
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.801
Positive Predictive Value 0.797
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 63
Total TN 21655
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 118
Total Scores
MCC 0.439
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.440 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.