CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.701 > 0.469
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078 > 0.504 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.519
Total TP 669 > 427
Total TN 135259 < 135348
Total FP 262 < 413
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 47
Total FP INCONS 208 < 348
Total FP COMP 20 > 18
Total FN 325 < 567
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 669
Total TN 135259
Total FP 262
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 208
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 325
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.17 0.15 0.20 11 32329 45 3 42 0 60
ASE_00429 - 0.38 0.33 0.43 22 28152 33 0 29 4 44
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 427
Total TN 135348
Total FP 413
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 348
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 567
Total Scores
MCC 0.469
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.519
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.49 0.49 0.48 35 32312 42 3 35 4 36
ASE_00429 - 0.45 0.45 0.45 30 28137 38 6 30 2 36
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 1019 12 2 10 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.42 0.35 0.54 7 767 6 0 6 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4155 31 0 31 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.66 0.63 0.71 5 371 2 0 2 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.68 0.55 0.86 6 554 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1998 19 1 17 1 21
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.42 0.39 0.47 16 4719 18 4 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4152 34 0 34 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 321 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 4 0 2 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.31 0.30 0.35 6 1111 11 0 11 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 227 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.59 16 4344 12 1 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - 0.44 0.33 0.63 5 488 3 1 2 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.82 0.68 1.00 15 1113 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.44 0.36 0.56 9 1814 7 0 7 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 894 9 2 7 0 15
RFA_00632 0.37 0.36 0.38 10 4069 19 0 16 3 18
RFA_00636 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 3978 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2002 17 1 13 3 18
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.