CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		Fold
MCC	0.701	>	0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.777 ± 0.078	>	0.574 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.673	>	0.491
Positive Predictive Value	0.734	>	0.574
Total TP	669	>	488
Total TN	135259	<	135320
Total FP	262	<	385
Total FP CONTRA	34	<	35
Total FP INCONS	208	<	327
Total FP COMP	20	<	23
Total FN	325	<	506
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Fold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Fold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Fold).

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	669
Total TN	135259
Total FP	262
Total FP CONTRA	34
Total FP INCONS	208
Total FP COMP	20
Total FN	325

Total Scores
MCC	0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.777 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.673
Positive Predictive Value	0.734
Nr of predictions	47

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
ASE_00408	-	0.17	0.15	0.20	11	32329	45	3	42	0	60
ASE_00429	-	0.38	0.33	0.43	22	28152	33	0	29	4	44
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.79	0.79	11	932	3	0	3	0	3
PDB_00018	-	0.90	0.90	0.90	18	1015	2	2	0	0	2
PDB_00020	-	0.79	0.75	0.83	15	762	3	0	3	0	5
PDB_00041	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_00053	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	424	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_00056	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	616	0	0	0	0	2
PDB_00123	-	0.94	0.94	0.94	34	4150	2	2	0	0	2
PDB_00124	-	0.86	0.90	0.82	9	485	2	2	0	0	1
PDB_00128	-	0.78	0.79	0.79	11	482	3	0	3	0	3
PDB_00134	-	0.94	1.00	0.89	8	369	1	1	0	0	0
PDB_00138	-	0.94	1.00	0.89	8	369	1	1	0	0	0
PDB_00209	-	0.96	1.00	0.92	11	549	1	1	0	0	0
PDB_00243	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_00352	-	0.90	0.95	0.86	18	1204	3	2	1	0	1
PDB_00571	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.80	0.95	20	3300	1	1	0	0	5
PDB_00713	-	0.24	0.24	0.26	5	1997	14	0	14	0	16
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.70	0.67	16	2677	9	0	8	1	7
PDB_00828	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	21	2464	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00829	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.42	0.45	10	2256	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_00842	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	370	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_00851	-	0.45	0.39	0.53	16	4723	14	0	14	0	25
PDB_00857	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	1066	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_00874	-	0.21	0.20	0.25	4	930	12	0	12	0	16
PDB_00886	-	0.34	0.35	0.35	14	4146	26	0	26	0	26
PDB_00918	-	0.93	1.00	0.88	7	317	1	1	0	0	0
PDB_01009	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.90	0.90	19	2464	5	0	2	3	2
PDB_01020	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	17	2261	1	0	0	1	6
PDB_01040	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1108	0	0	0	0	0
PDB_01059	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	222	2	2	0	0	0
PDB_01073	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.65	0.88	22	4346	4	2	1	1	12
PDB_01194	-	0.97	0.93	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	1
PDB_01201	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	20	1108	0	0	0	0	2
PDB_01203	-	0.74	0.68	0.81	13	1160	3	2	1	0	6
PDB_01260	-	0.41	0.36	0.47	9	1811	10	0	10	0	16
PDB_01281	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	366	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_01299	-	0.90	0.87	0.93	13	889	1	1	0	0	2
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.54	0.56	15	4068	12	2	10	0	13
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.82	0.74	23	3974	8	7	1	0	5
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	1873	4	0	0	4	0
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	1873	0	0	0	0	0
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.95	18	1934	1	1	0	0	0
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	14	2002	3	0	0	3	4
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.95	18	1934	4	1	0	3	0
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.94	1.00	17	1936	0	0	0	0	1
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.81	0.76	13	2128	4	0	4	0	3

^top

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	488
Total TN	135320
Total FP	385
Total FP CONTRA	35
Total FP INCONS	327
Total FP COMP	23
Total FN	506

Total Scores
MCC	0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.574 ± 0.078
Sensitivity	0.491
Positive Predictive Value	0.574
Nr of predictions	47

^top

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
ASE_00408	-	0.65	0.66	0.64	47	32311	32	4	23	5	24
ASE_00429	-	0.54	0.52	0.57	34	28143	35	2	24	9	32
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.79	1.00	11	935	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00018	-	0.20	0.20	0.22	4	1017	14	2	12	0	16
PDB_00020	-	0.75	0.65	0.87	13	765	2	0	2	0	7
PDB_00041	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	6	624	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00053	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	429	0	0	0	0	5
PDB_00056	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	616	0	0	0	0	2
PDB_00123	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4151	35	0	35	0	36
PDB_00124	-	0.59	0.50	0.71	5	489	2	0	2	0	5
PDB_00128	-	0.80	0.71	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	4
PDB_00134	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00138	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00209	-	0.56	0.45	0.71	5	554	2	0	2	0	6
PDB_00243	-	0.63	0.58	0.70	7	620	3	0	3	0	5
PDB_00352	-	0.39	0.37	0.44	7	1209	9	0	9	0	12
PDB_00571	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.76	0.95	19	3301	1	1	0	0	6
PDB_00713	-	0.43	0.43	0.45	9	1996	11	0	11	0	12
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2678	24	1	22	1	23
PDB_00828	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	21	2464	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00829	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	2260	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00842	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00851	-	0.45	0.39	0.53	16	4723	14	0	14	0	25
PDB_00857	-	0.67	0.60	0.75	9	1069	3	0	3	0	6
PDB_00874	-	0.09	0.10	0.11	2	928	16	2	14	0	18
PDB_00886	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4148	38	0	38	0	40
PDB_00918	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	321	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_01009	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.52	0.41	11	2458	16	5	11	0	10
PDB_01020	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	17	2261	1	0	0	1	6
PDB_01040	-	0.30	0.30	0.32	6	1109	13	0	13	0	14
PDB_01059	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	227	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_01073	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	25	4346	1	0	0	1	9
PDB_01194	-	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	487	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_01201	-	0.82	0.68	1.00	15	1113	0	0	0	0	7
PDB_01203	-	0.71	0.63	0.80	12	1161	3	2	1	0	7
PDB_01260	-	0.58	0.48	0.71	12	1813	5	1	4	0	13
PDB_01281	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	366	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_01299	-	0.74	0.67	0.83	10	891	2	1	1	0	5
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.39	0.39	11	4067	17	2	15	0	17
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.43	0.43	12	3977	16	2	14	0	16
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.44	0.44	8	1873	10	1	9	0	10
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.44	0.47	8	1874	10	1	8	1	10
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.56	0.56	10	1935	8	3	5	0	8
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	2001	8	0	5	3	8
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.56	0.91	10	1942	3	1	0	2	8
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.56	0.56	10	1935	8	3	5	0	8
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.38	0.38	6	2129	10	1	9	0	10

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]