CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold IPknot
MCC 0.701 > 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078 > 0.608 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.641
Total TP 669 > 508
Total TN 135259 < 135377
Total FP 262 < 294
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 35
Total FP INCONS 208 < 250
Total FP COMP 20 > 9
Total FN 325 < 486
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 669
Total TN 135259
Total FP 262
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 208
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 325
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.17 0.15 0.20 11 32329 45 3 42 0 60
ASE_00429 - 0.38 0.33 0.43 22 28152 33 0 29 4 44
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 508
Total TN 135377
Total FP 294
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 250
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 486
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.641
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.71 0.61 0.84 43 32334 8 1 7 0 28
ASE_00429 - 0.59 0.56 0.62 37 28143 24 6 17 1 29
PDB_00005 0.71 0.71 0.71 10 932 4 0 4 0 4
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.17 0.20 0.18 2 485 9 2 7 0 8
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.79 0.76 0.83 19 3298 4 2 2 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.52 0.43 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 21 0 21 0 23
PDB_00828 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2463 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.93 0.87 1.00 13 1068 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.71 0.81 0.63 17 2458 10 5 5 0 4
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.52 0.33 0.83 5 490 1 1 0 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.61 0.45 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 12
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.58 0.48 0.71 12 1813 5 1 4 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 890 3 2 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.42 0.36 0.50 10 4075 11 0 10 1 18
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 8 1 4 3 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.