CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.798 > 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.094 > 0.548 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.772 > 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.590
Total TP 251 > 164
Total TN 36658 < 36683
Total FP 65 < 116
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 20
Total FP INCONS 39 < 94
Total FP COMP 13 > 2
Total FN 74 < 161
P-value 1.50834591464e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 251
Total TN 36658
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.798
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.772
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 164
Total TN 36683
Total FP 116
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.590
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.59 0.36 1.00 5 941 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2681 21 1 19 1 23
PDB_00828 0.82 0.67 1.00 18 2467 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 4343 4 1 2 1 9
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 19 1 18 0 21
RFA_00636 0.35 0.36 0.36 10 3977 18 2 16 0 18
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00809 0.30 0.31 0.29 5 2128 12 1 11 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.