CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.798 > 0.406
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.094 > 0.334 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.772 > 0.212
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.784
Total TP 251 > 69
Total TN 36658 < 36873
Total FP 65 > 20
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 3
Total FP INCONS 39 > 16
Total FP COMP 13 > 1
Total FN 74 < 256
P-value 1.86109605532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 251
Total TN 36658
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.798
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.772
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 36873
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 256
Total Scores
MCC 0.406
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.334 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.212
Positive Predictive Value 0.784
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.60 0.43 0.86 6 939 2 0 1 1 8
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00828 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 27
PDB_00829 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 24
PDB_01020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_01073 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 34
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1881 1 0 1 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.