CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Multilign(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Multilign(seed)
MCC 0.943 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.941 ± 0.073 > 0.575 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.935 > 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.951 > 0.623
Total TP 116 > 66
Total TN 13680 < 13696
Total FP 16 < 40
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 5
Total FP INCONS 4 < 35
Total FP COMP 10 > 0
Total FN 8 < 58
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 13680
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 8
Total Scores
MCC 0.943
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.941 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.935
Positive Predictive Value 0.951
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 13696
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.623
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.