CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold NanoFolder
MCC 0.663 > 0.191
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.223 > 0.245 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.602 > 0.218
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.175
Total TP 130 > 47
Total TN 45039 > 44947
Total FP 60 < 236
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 29
Total FP INCONS 45 < 193
Total FP COMP 13 < 14
Total FN 86 < 169
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 130
Total TN 45039
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00429 - 0.38 0.33 0.43 22 28152 33 0 29 4 44
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 47
Total TN 44947
Total FP 236
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 193
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 169
Total Scores
MCC 0.191
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.245 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.218
Positive Predictive Value 0.175
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00429 - 0.08 0.09 0.07 6 28114 84 14 69 1 60
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.