CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
MCC 0.809 > 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.827 ± 0.082 > 0.721 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.782 > 0.666
Positive Predictive Value 0.841 > 0.821
Total TP 290 > 247
Total TN 42422 < 42466
Total FP 71 > 61
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 32
Total FP INCONS 41 > 22
Total FP COMP 16 > 7
Total FN 81 < 124
P-value 2.54914456376e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 290
Total TN 42422
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.809
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.827 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.782
Positive Predictive Value 0.841
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 247
Total TN 42466
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.666
Positive Predictive Value 0.821
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00571 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 3299 2 2 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 3 2 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 2256 3 2 0 1 4
PDB_01009 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 2465 3 0 1 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 2257 4 2 0 2 4
PDB_01073 0.77 0.68 0.88 23 4345 4 2 1 1 11
RFA_00632 0.69 0.64 0.75 18 4071 6 2 4 0 10
RFA_00636 0.73 0.68 0.79 19 3981 5 2 3 0 9
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.