CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold ProbKnot
MCC 0.701 > 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078 > 0.575 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.579
Total TP 669 > 509
Total TN 135259 < 135291
Total FP 262 < 395
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 37
Total FP INCONS 208 < 333
Total FP COMP 20 < 25
Total FN 325 < 485
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 669
Total TN 135259
Total FP 262
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 208
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 325
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.17 0.15 0.20 11 32329 45 3 42 0 60
ASE_00429 - 0.38 0.33 0.43 22 28152 33 0 29 4 44
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 509
Total TN 135291
Total FP 395
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 333
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 485
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.579
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.70 0.72 0.68 51 32310 31 4 20 7 20
ASE_00429 - 0.56 0.52 0.61 34 28147 31 0 22 9 32
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.77 0.71 0.83 10 484 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1209 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00571 0.60 0.60 0.60 15 3296 10 6 4 0 10
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 12 0 11 1 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 1066 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00874 - 0.05 0.05 0.08 1 933 12 2 10 0 19
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 2462 12 5 6 1 9
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 224 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01194 - 0.69 0.60 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.53 0.48 0.60 12 1810 8 1 7 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 16 0 16 0 17
RFA_00636 0.44 0.46 0.43 13 3975 17 0 17 0 15
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.44 0.44 0.44 8 1873 11 1 9 1 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 2000 9 0 6 3 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00809 0.35 0.38 0.33 6 2127 12 1 11 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.