CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNAwolf
MCC 0.701 > 0.389
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078 > 0.407 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.413
Total TP 669 > 372
Total TN 135259 < 135269
Total FP 262 < 572
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 61
Total FP INCONS 208 < 468
Total FP COMP 20 < 43
Total FN 325 < 622
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 669
Total TN 135259
Total FP 262
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 208
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 325
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.17 0.15 0.20 11 32329 45 3 42 0 60
ASE_00429 - 0.38 0.33 0.43 22 28152 33 0 29 4 44
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 372
Total TN 135269
Total FP 572
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 468
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 622
Total Scores
MCC 0.389
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.407 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.413
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00408 - 0.32 0.32 0.32 23 32312 59 6 44 9 48
ASE_00429 - 0.36 0.38 0.35 25 28131 54 12 35 7 41
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.15 0.25 3 1023 9 2 7 0 17
PDB_00020 - 0.39 0.35 0.47 7 765 8 0 8 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.61 0.50 0.75 6 622 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 16
PDB_00123 - 0.31 0.33 0.30 12 4146 28 4 24 0 24
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 2 9 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 3 0 1 2 3
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 371 7 0 7 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.74 0.55 1.00 6 555 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.54 0.42 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1211 3 0 3 0 8
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00713 - 0.28 0.24 0.33 5 2001 11 0 10 1 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.34 0.34 0.35 14 4713 26 0 26 0 27
PDB_00857 - 0.57 0.60 0.56 9 1065 7 0 7 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 18 0 18 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4143 43 4 39 0 40
PDB_00918 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 317 8 0 8 0 7
PDB_01009 0.45 0.52 0.39 11 2457 18 6 11 1 10
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01040 - 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1108 15 1 14 0 15
PDB_01059 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 226 5 1 4 0 7
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01194 - 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01201 - 0.75 0.68 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1165 11 0 11 0 19
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1809 21 0 21 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 365 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.65 0.53 0.80 8 893 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.