CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots Mastr(20)
MCC 0.717 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.382 > 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.639 > 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 > 0.693
Total TP 85 > 61
Total TN 14628 < 14645
Total FP 22 < 28
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 4
Total FP INCONS 12 < 23
Total FP COMP 2 > 1
Total FN 48 < 72
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 14628
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 48
Total Scores
MCC 0.717
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.382
Sensitivity 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.17 0.16 0.19 4 3300 17 6 11 0 21
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 4343 4 2 1 1 9

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 14645
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 3 16 1 25
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 2263 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.34 0.24 0.50 8 4355 8 1 7 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.