CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots NanoFolder
MCC 0.431 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.376 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.416 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.457 > 0.281
Total TP 69 > 57
Total TN 18878 > 18826
Total FP 88 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 22
Total FP INCONS 71 < 124
Total FP COMP 6 < 13
Total FN 97 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 18878
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.431
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.376
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.457
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.17 0.16 0.19 4 3300 17 6 11 0 21
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 20 0 17 3 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 22 0 19 3 18
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.