CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.646 > 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.106 > 0.640 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.592 > 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 < 0.716
Total TP 138 > 131
Total TN 46889 < 46901
Total FP 64 > 57
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 11
Total FP INCONS 42 > 41
Total FP COMP 7 > 5
Total FN 95 < 102
P-value 3.01818206431e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 138
Total TN 46889
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.58 0.58 0.58 38 27195 30 7 21 2 27
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 8 1 4 3 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 46901
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.