CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.605 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.123 > 0.595 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.485 > 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.723
Total TP 451 > 357
Total TN 493712 < 493814
Total FP 189 > 165
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 16
Total FP INCONS 125 > 121
Total FP COMP 44 > 28
Total FN 479 < 573
P-value 1.34193807955e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 451
Total TN 493712
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 125
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 479
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.82 0.71 0.94 63 45384 7 1 3 3 26
ASE_00090 0.66 0.54 0.81 55 55543 16 2 11 3 46
ASE_00135 0.40 0.32 0.51 35 63121 35 4 30 1 74
ASE_00153 0.60 0.48 0.76 35 57584 26 0 11 15 38
ASE_00215 0.38 0.26 0.54 26 48468 23 2 20 1 73
ASE_00328 0.73 0.66 0.80 74 72679 31 5 13 13 38
ASE_00361 0.66 0.46 0.94 59 75403 7 1 3 3 68
ASE_00441 0.32 0.24 0.43 27 64198 40 4 32 4 85
PDB_00828 0.82 0.67 1.00 18 2467 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 4343 4 1 2 1 9

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 357
Total TN 493814
Total FP 165
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 573
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.