CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.526 > 0.363
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.107 > 0.399 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.510 > 0.184
Positive Predictive Value 0.544 < 0.716
Total TP 876 > 317
Total TN 1068977 < 1070143
Total FP 883 > 134
Total FP CONTRA 167 > 6
Total FP INCONS 566 > 120
Total FP COMP 150 > 8
Total FN 843 < 1402
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 876
Total TN 1068977
Total FP 883
Total FP CONTRA 167
Total FP INCONS 566
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 843
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.544
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.10 0.10 0.11 11 103641 107 9 79 19 104
CRW_00016 0.66 0.61 0.72 73 77320 38 5 23 10 47
CRW_00610 0.50 0.48 0.51 39 36239 38 6 31 1 42
CRW_00613 0.81 0.73 0.89 57 34916 15 0 7 8 21
CRW_00614 0.07 0.09 0.06 5 121689 132 26 51 55 52
CRW_00618 0.37 0.39 0.34 24 56210 60 15 31 14 37
CRW_00633 0.74 0.72 0.77 76 63447 26 8 15 3 30
CRW_00634 0.44 0.41 0.47 39 64537 48 18 26 4 55
CRW_00670 0.54 0.53 0.55 63 70011 53 6 45 2 57
CRW_00671 0.66 0.59 0.74 69 62742 28 5 19 4 48
CRW_00672 0.52 0.50 0.56 55 72291 48 9 35 4 56
CRW_00674 0.43 0.42 0.44 52 83319 69 14 51 4 72
CRW_00676 0.30 0.30 0.31 35 93414 85 9 70 6 80
CRW_00692 0.26 0.27 0.25 24 68538 77 23 50 4 66
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00827 0.68 0.59 0.79 48 26967 15 0 13 2 33
PDB_01092 0.81 0.75 0.89 39 10109 6 1 4 1 13
RFA_00632 0.88 0.89 0.86 25 4066 4 3 1 0 3
RFA_00636 0.73 0.71 0.74 20 3978 7 5 2 0 8
RFA_00769 0.85 0.94 0.77 17 1931 5 4 1 0 1
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 4 0 0 4 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 5 1 0 4 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 317
Total TN 1070143
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 1402
Total Scores
MCC 0.363
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.184
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.