CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.932 > 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.933 ± 0.069 > 0.664 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.936 > 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.929 > 0.833
Total TP 131 > 75
Total TN 15677 < 15728
Total FP 18 > 15
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 6
Total FP INCONS 5 < 9
Total FP COMP 8 > 0
Total FN 9 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 15677
Total FP 18
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 9
Total Scores
MCC 0.932
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.933 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.936
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.85 0.94 0.77 17 1931 5 4 1 0 1
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 4 0 0 4 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 5 1 0 4 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 15728
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.