CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.580 > 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.036 > 0.573 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.475 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.709 > 0.705
Total TP 2068 > 1906
Total TN 2798996 < 2799211
Total FP 1022 > 999
Total FP CONTRA 200 < 247
Total FP INCONS 650 > 550
Total FP COMP 172 < 202
Total FN 2285 < 2447
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2068
Total TN 2798996
Total FP 1022
Total FP CONTRA 200
Total FP INCONS 650
Total FP COMP 172
Total FN 2285
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.55 0.39 0.76 35 45405 14 3 8 3 54
ASE_00135 0.34 0.24 0.49 26 63137 29 3 24 2 83
ASE_00153 0.34 0.23 0.50 17 57596 26 3 14 9 56
ASE_00215 0.46 0.31 0.69 31 48471 14 4 10 0 68
ASE_00328 0.59 0.48 0.72 54 72696 27 5 16 6 58
ASE_00361 0.57 0.39 0.82 50 75405 11 1 10 0 77
PDB_00571 0.59 0.52 0.68 13 3302 7 0 6 1 12
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.82 0.67 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 4356 1 0 0 1 19
TMR_00017 0.72 0.60 0.87 61 67091 13 0 9 4 41
TMR_00018 0.56 0.49 0.65 45 64551 29 6 18 5 47
TMR_00042 0.56 0.44 0.70 43 62774 19 1 17 1 55
TMR_00046 0.60 0.52 0.69 50 62763 23 6 16 1 46
TMR_00048 0.56 0.48 0.66 46 64910 29 9 15 5 49
TMR_00080 0.54 0.49 0.60 47 70422 35 12 19 4 49
TMR_00082 0.59 0.50 0.71 48 67828 25 7 13 5 48
TMR_00123 0.64 0.50 0.81 51 66367 17 3 9 5 50
TMR_00137 0.54 0.46 0.64 41 61011 28 5 18 5 48
TMR_00142 0.64 0.60 0.69 61 70788 34 12 15 7 41
TMR_00207 0.53 0.42 0.66 43 72325 26 4 18 4 60
TMR_00257 0.56 0.48 0.64 47 67088 29 4 22 3 51
TMR_00271 0.55 0.42 0.72 38 64208 20 1 14 5 53
TMR_00332 0.70 0.58 0.85 57 67094 16 0 10 6 42
TMR_00366 0.53 0.49 0.58 49 67811 43 8 28 7 51
TMR_00378 0.57 0.51 0.64 49 67820 37 9 18 10 48
TMR_00404 0.53 0.41 0.68 38 67472 21 8 10 3 54
TMR_00427 0.20 0.13 0.30 13 67485 30 4 26 0 84
TMR_00443 0.73 0.61 0.88 63 67089 13 0 9 4 41
TMR_00451 0.52 0.46 0.58 41 63475 36 8 22 6 48
TMR_00458 0.50 0.41 0.61 38 63484 29 4 20 5 55
TMR_00469 0.64 0.48 0.84 48 64563 10 3 6 1 52
TMR_00472 0.70 0.61 0.81 59 64547 15 8 6 1 38
TMR_00519 0.49 0.37 0.65 35 63136 23 2 17 4 60
TMR_00520 0.44 0.35 0.54 35 63125 36 5 25 6 64
TMR_00522 0.49 0.39 0.60 38 63127 29 8 17 4 59
TMR_00528 0.48 0.41 0.57 40 63120 36 7 23 6 57
TMR_00540 0.53 0.45 0.63 47 73461 28 8 20 0 57
TMR_00568 0.72 0.64 0.82 63 60649 18 3 11 4 36
TMR_00571 0.76 0.67 0.86 66 60649 15 2 9 4 33
TMR_00580 0.75 0.66 0.86 66 60649 15 2 9 4 34
TMR_00584 0.71 0.62 0.81 60 61001 17 4 10 3 37
TMR_00586 0.71 0.63 0.79 61 60998 20 5 11 4 36
TMR_00616 0.67 0.58 0.79 57 67089 16 6 9 1 42
TMR_00699 0.57 0.43 0.75 44 67102 19 1 14 4 58
TMR_00702 0.54 0.43 0.68 43 67098 25 3 17 5 57
TMR_00703 0.58 0.45 0.75 45 67468 19 3 12 4 54

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1906
Total TN 2799211
Total FP 999
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 550
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2447
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.