CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) Afold
MCC 0.588 > 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.117 > 0.439 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.501 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.692 > 0.412
Total TP 344 > 268
Total TN 1012223 > 1012069
Total FP 175 < 417
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 54
Total FP INCONS 147 < 329
Total FP COMP 22 < 34
Total FN 343 < 419
P-value 1.70887622364e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 344
Total TN 1012223
Total FP 175
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 343
Total Scores
MCC 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.692
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.64 0.61 0.68 263 977515 145 6 117 22 171
PDB_00716 0.23 0.13 0.43 3 2694 4 0 4 0 20
PDB_01092 0.69 0.48 1.00 25 10128 0 0 0 0 27
RFA_00632 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 4088 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00636 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 3998 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 268
Total TN 1012069
Total FP 417
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 329
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 419
Total Scores
MCC 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.439 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.412
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.37 0.37 0.37 160 977470 284 42 229 13 274
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.