CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.584 > 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.098 > 0.425 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.492 > 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.694 > 0.419
Total TP 354 > 279
Total TN 1015109 > 1014953
Total FP 180 < 415
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 63
Total FP INCONS 150 < 324
Total FP COMP 24 < 28
Total FN 365 < 440
P-value 1.86109605532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 1015109
Total FP 180
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 365
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.694
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.64 0.61 0.68 263 977515 145 6 117 22 171
PDB_00005 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 942 2 0 0 2 10
PDB_00716 0.23 0.13 0.43 3 2694 4 0 4 0 20
PDB_01092 0.69 0.48 1.00 25 10128 0 0 0 0 27
RFA_00632 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 4088 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00636 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 3998 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00779 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1944 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 279
Total TN 1014953
Total FP 415
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 324
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.403
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.425 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.419
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.37 0.36 0.38 158 977489 271 43 211 17 276
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_01092 0.68 0.62 0.76 32 10111 12 1 9 2 20
RFA_00632 0.37 0.36 0.38 10 4069 19 0 16 3 18
RFA_00636 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 3978 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2002 17 1 13 3 18
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.