CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.584 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.098 < 0.606 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.492 > 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.694 > 0.633
Total TP 354 > 335
Total TN 1015109 > 1015090
Total FP 180 < 212
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 25
Total FP INCONS 150 < 169
Total FP COMP 24 > 18
Total FN 365 < 384
P-value 5.23236503487e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 1015109
Total FP 180
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 365
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.694
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.64 0.61 0.68 263 977515 145 6 117 22 171
PDB_00005 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 942 2 0 0 2 10
PDB_00716 0.23 0.13 0.43 3 2694 4 0 4 0 20
PDB_01092 0.69 0.48 1.00 25 10128 0 0 0 0 27
RFA_00632 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 4088 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00636 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 3998 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00779 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1944 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 335
Total TN 1015090
Total FP 212
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 169
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 384
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01343 0.50 0.42 0.59 182 977595 134 16 108 10 252
PDB_00005 0.71 0.71 0.71 10 932 4 0 4 0 4
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 21 0 21 0 23
PDB_01092 0.73 0.63 0.85 33 10114 8 1 5 2 19
RFA_00632 0.42 0.36 0.50 10 4075 11 0 10 1 18
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 8 1 4 3 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.