CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.275 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.248 > 0.148 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.323 > 0.024
Positive Predictive Value 0.236 < 0.944
Total TP 224 > 17
Total TN 403467 < 404397
Total FP 755 > 1
Total FP CONTRA 150 > 1
Total FP INCONS 574 > 0
Total FP COMP 31 > 0
Total FN 470 < 677
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 224
Total TN 403467
Total FP 755
Total FP CONTRA 150
Total FP INCONS 574
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 470
Total Scores
MCC 0.275
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.236
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00196 0.49 0.57 0.42 43 31524 62 16 43 3 32
ASE_00417 0.32 0.36 0.28 36 54486 98 18 75 5 64
CRW_00671 0.18 0.21 0.16 24 62682 130 23 106 1 93
CRW_00672 0.36 0.43 0.31 48 72233 114 35 74 5 63
CRW_00674 0.16 0.19 0.14 23 83274 142 19 120 3 101
CRW_00676 0.11 0.14 0.09 16 93347 169 29 136 4 99
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 17
Total TN 404397
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 677
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.148 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.024
Positive Predictive Value 0.944
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.