CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder MCFold
MCC 0.304 > 0.248
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351 > 0.257 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.343 > 0.283
Positive Predictive Value 0.281 > 0.229
Total TP 57 > 47
Total TN 18826 > 18824
Total FP 159 < 173
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 16
Total FP INCONS 124 < 142
Total FP COMP 13 < 15
Total FN 109 < 119
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and MCFold).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 47
Total TN 18824
Total FP 173
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.248
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.257 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.283
Positive Predictive Value 0.229
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3287 34 3 31 0 25
PDB_00828 0.34 0.37 0.33 10 2455 22 1 19 2 17
PDB_00851 - 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 4711 32 0 32 0 31
PDB_01009 0.43 0.52 0.35 11 2454 21 5 15 1 10
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.