Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of MCFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
MCFold |
|---|
| MCC |
0.854 |
>
|
0.291 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.858
±
0.048
|
>
|
0.279
±
0.236
|
| Sensitivity |
0.759 |
>
|
0.323 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.962 |
>
|
0.274 |
| Total TP |
101 |
>
|
43 |
| Total TN |
14628 |
>
|
14576 |
| Total FP |
12 |
<
|
121 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
<
|
13 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
<
|
101 |
| Total FP COMP |
8 |
>
|
7 |
| Total FN |
32 |
<
|
90 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MCFold).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MCFold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MCFold).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
101 |
| Total TN |
14628 |
| Total FP |
12 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
| Total FP COMP |
8 |
| Total FN |
32 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.854 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.858
±
0.048
|
| Sensitivity |
0.759 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.962 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Performance of MCFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
43 |
| Total TN |
14576 |
| Total FP |
121 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
13 |
| Total FP INCONS |
101 |
| Total FP COMP |
7 |
| Total FN |
90 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.291 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.279
±
0.236
|
| Sensitivity |
0.323 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.274 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
