CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.656 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.033 > 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.575 > 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.749 > 0.705
Total TP 2624 > 1981
Total TN 2918283 < 2918978
Total FP 1181 > 1029
Total FP CONTRA 274 > 247
Total FP INCONS 605 > 580
Total FP COMP 302 > 202
Total FN 1942 < 2585
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2624
Total TN 2918283
Total FP 1181
Total FP CONTRA 274
Total FP INCONS 605
Total FP COMP 302
Total FN 1942
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.033
Sensitivity 0.575
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.79 0.74 0.85 66 45373 18 3 9 6 23
ASE_00090 0.81 0.72 0.90 73 55530 13 3 5 5 28
ASE_00135 0.63 0.55 0.71 60 63106 27 5 19 3 49
ASE_00153 0.40 0.37 0.44 27 57569 41 7 27 7 46
ASE_00215 0.60 0.47 0.77 47 48455 18 4 10 4 52
ASE_00328 0.79 0.76 0.83 85 72668 27 3 15 9 27
ASE_00361 0.69 0.54 0.89 68 75390 14 2 6 6 59
ASE_00441 0.70 0.57 0.86 64 64187 14 2 8 4 48
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_01020 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 2260 3 0 0 3 5
PDB_01073 0.79 0.71 0.89 24 4344 4 2 1 1 10
TMR_00017 0.74 0.61 0.90 62 67092 15 2 5 8 40
TMR_00018 0.60 0.53 0.67 49 64547 31 9 15 7 43
TMR_00042 0.63 0.53 0.74 52 62765 19 5 13 1 46
TMR_00046 0.42 0.38 0.47 36 62759 42 7 33 2 60
TMR_00048 0.61 0.54 0.69 51 64906 30 8 15 7 44
TMR_00080 0.66 0.60 0.73 58 70420 26 10 12 4 38
TMR_00082 0.59 0.49 0.70 47 67829 27 7 13 7 49
TMR_00123 0.68 0.54 0.85 55 66365 18 3 7 8 46
TMR_00137 0.68 0.63 0.74 56 60999 29 8 12 9 33
TMR_00142 0.46 0.42 0.51 43 70792 44 12 29 3 59
TMR_00207 0.66 0.52 0.84 54 72326 22 2 8 12 49
TMR_00257 0.73 0.61 0.87 60 67092 18 4 5 9 38
TMR_00271 0.58 0.49 0.69 45 64196 23 9 11 3 46
TMR_00332 0.71 0.61 0.83 60 67089 21 3 9 9 39
TMR_00366 0.48 0.45 0.52 45 67810 45 10 31 4 55
TMR_00378 0.45 0.41 0.48 40 67813 48 10 33 5 57
TMR_00404 0.52 0.46 0.60 42 67458 32 11 17 4 50
TMR_00427 0.60 0.49 0.74 48 67463 20 9 8 3 49
TMR_00443 0.81 0.71 0.93 74 67081 13 2 4 7 30
TMR_00451 0.59 0.54 0.64 48 63471 38 14 13 11 41
TMR_00458 0.69 0.61 0.77 57 63472 24 10 7 7 36
TMR_00469 0.73 0.64 0.84 64 64544 18 7 5 6 36
TMR_00472 0.67 0.61 0.73 59 64539 31 11 11 9 38
TMR_00519 0.63 0.56 0.72 53 63116 33 8 13 12 42
TMR_00520 0.65 0.58 0.74 57 63113 28 3 17 8 42
TMR_00522 0.60 0.53 0.68 51 63115 31 7 17 7 46
TMR_00528 0.50 0.45 0.56 44 63111 40 12 23 5 53
TMR_00540 0.66 0.60 0.73 62 73451 28 7 16 5 42
TMR_00568 0.71 0.66 0.76 65 60641 29 2 18 9 34
TMR_00571 0.74 0.69 0.79 68 60640 27 2 16 9 31
TMR_00580 0.73 0.67 0.80 67 60642 26 5 12 9 33
TMR_00584 0.78 0.70 0.87 68 60997 19 2 8 9 29
TMR_00586 0.74 0.68 0.81 66 60994 23 5 10 8 31
TMR_00616 0.69 0.62 0.76 61 67081 25 9 10 6 38
TMR_00699 0.70 0.56 0.88 57 67096 13 1 7 5 45
TMR_00702 0.61 0.50 0.75 50 67094 24 4 13 7 50
TMR_00703 0.71 0.60 0.84 59 67458 17 2 9 6 40

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.