CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.734 > 0.155
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.740 ± 0.021 > 0.154 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.633 > 0.178
Positive Predictive Value 0.850 > 0.138
Total TP 3194 > 896
Total TN 2872413 > 2869693
Total FP 785 < 5694
Total FP CONTRA 122 < 745
Total FP INCONS 440 < 4835
Total FP COMP 223 > 114
Total FN 1848 < 4146
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3194
Total TN 2872413
Total FP 785
Total FP CONTRA 122
Total FP INCONS 440
Total FP COMP 223
Total FN 1848
Total Scores
MCC 0.734
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.740 ± 0.021
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.74 0.62 0.89 68 62405 13 3 5 5 42
ASE_00185 0.68 0.52 0.90 66 73463 12 3 4 5 62
ASE_00190 0.75 0.64 0.87 58 45384 12 1 8 3 32
ASE_00221 0.85 0.78 0.93 91 64522 10 1 6 3 26
ASE_00228 0.75 0.69 0.83 59 46900 16 2 10 4 27
ASE_00229 0.88 0.79 0.97 69 42415 5 2 0 3 18
ASE_00231 0.67 0.57 0.77 55 47824 22 1 15 6 41
ASE_00234 0.66 0.53 0.83 68 75384 20 6 8 6 61
ASE_00238 0.67 0.56 0.80 64 64181 22 5 11 6 50
ASE_00248 0.86 0.81 0.91 92 62380 13 1 8 4 22
ASE_00254 0.85 0.77 0.94 63 36789 8 2 2 4 19
ASE_00255 0.62 0.55 0.71 72 74589 32 4 26 2 58
ASE_00257 0.73 0.65 0.82 63 50963 17 4 10 3 34
ASE_00267 0.84 0.77 0.91 68 45075 13 2 5 6 20
ASE_00270 0.58 0.43 0.79 55 72320 19 2 13 4 73
ASE_00274 0.68 0.60 0.78 62 55531 21 5 13 3 41
ASE_00279 0.79 0.69 0.90 70 53223 11 3 5 3 31
ASE_00285 0.70 0.55 0.91 67 68932 11 2 5 4 55
ASE_00287 0.69 0.60 0.79 62 54868 20 1 15 4 41
ASE_00294 0.72 0.57 0.92 97 114375 13 2 7 4 74
ASE_00298 0.72 0.61 0.85 69 67447 15 3 9 3 44
ASE_00318 0.75 0.66 0.85 78 80108 21 1 13 7 40
ASE_00335 0.77 0.70 0.85 81 75371 25 1 13 11 35
ASE_00340 0.75 0.67 0.85 57 45989 17 1 9 7 28
ASE_00367 0.85 0.79 0.91 68 42996 11 2 5 4 18
ASE_00372 0.76 0.65 0.88 65 51929 15 1 8 6 35
ASE_00376 0.73 0.63 0.85 66 56875 15 1 11 3 39
ASE_00377 0.76 0.65 0.88 70 57550 13 3 7 3 37
ASE_00386 0.79 0.71 0.88 68 50326 12 2 7 3 28
ASE_00393 0.74 0.68 0.82 63 47818 19 1 13 5 30
ASE_00412 0.62 0.54 0.71 57 58231 28 5 18 5 48
ASE_00413 0.76 0.73 0.79 59 44476 23 4 12 7 22
ASE_00416 0.74 0.66 0.82 84 77319 23 4 14 5 43
ASE_00422 0.82 0.73 0.91 69 46895 13 1 6 6 25
ASE_00428 0.75 0.68 0.83 85 76533 21 4 14 3 40
ASE_00430 0.75 0.66 0.85 64 46896 14 1 10 3 33
ASE_00437 0.58 0.50 0.69 67 79304 33 1 29 3 68
ASE_00451 0.81 0.73 0.91 91 70776 12 1 8 3 34
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 2 0 0 2 8
TMR_00123 0.68 0.52 0.88 53 66370 12 1 6 5 48
TMR_00399 0.70 0.61 0.81 57 64910 21 6 7 8 37
TMR_00443 0.76 0.63 0.93 65 67091 11 2 3 6 39
TMR_00469 0.73 0.61 0.88 61 64551 11 4 4 3 39
TMR_00519 0.63 0.54 0.74 51 63121 25 7 11 7 44
TMR_00528 0.62 0.51 0.75 49 63125 20 5 11 4 48
TMR_00571 0.77 0.68 0.88 67 60650 15 2 7 6 32
TMR_00584 0.78 0.66 0.93 64 61006 13 2 3 8 33
TMR_00703 0.71 0.59 0.87 58 67461 14 3 6 5 41

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 896
Total TN 2869693
Total FP 5694
Total FP CONTRA 745
Total FP INCONS 4835
Total FP COMP 114
Total FN 4146
Total Scores
MCC 0.155
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.154 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.178
Positive Predictive Value 0.138
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.