CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.664 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.072 > 0.486 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.533 > 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.529
Total TP 65 > 54
Total TN 13787 > 13763
Total FP 13 < 62
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 8
Total FP INCONS 8 < 40
Total FP COMP 0 < 14
Total FN 57 < 68
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 65
Total TN 13787
Total FP 13
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 54
Total TN 13763
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 68
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.529
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.