CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.666 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060 > 0.555 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.536 > 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.593
Total TP 75 > 73
Total TN 15728 > 15695
Total FP 15 < 53
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 9
Total FP INCONS 9 < 41
Total FP COMP 0 < 3
Total FN 65 < 67
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 15728
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 73
Total TN 15695
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.593
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 7 0 4 3 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 0 4 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.