CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
MCC 0.666 > 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060 > 0.618 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.536 = 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.721
Total TP 75 = 75
Total TN 15728 > 15714
Total FP 15 < 29
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 19
Total FP INCONS 9 < 10
Total FP COMP 0 = 0
Total FN 65 = 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 15728
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 15714
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.