CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.666 > 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060 > 0.483 ± 0.187
Sensitivity 0.536 > 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.516
Total TP 75 > 64
Total TN 15728 > 15694
Total FP 15 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 12
Total FP INCONS 9 < 48
Total FP COMP 0 < 6
Total FN 65 < 76
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 15728
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 15694
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 76
Total Scores
MCC 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.483 ± 0.187
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.516
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.