CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots CentroidFold
MCC 0.697 > 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.084 > 0.586 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.668 > 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.733 > 0.621
Total TP 583 > 423
Total TN 76803 < 76917
Total FP 237 < 265
Total FP CONTRA 31 > 25
Total FP INCONS 181 < 233
Total FP COMP 25 > 7
Total FN 290 < 450
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 583
Total TN 76803
Total FP 237
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 181
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 290
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 932 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00018 - 0.68 0.55 0.85 11 1022 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_00020 - 0.77 0.65 0.93 13 766 1 0 1 0 7
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4153 33 0 33 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.45 0.43 0.47 9 1997 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00716 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2678 8 0 7 1 7
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 2 0 0 2 7
PDB_00829 0.60 0.46 0.79 11 2264 5 0 3 2 13
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 930 16 0 16 0 20
PDB_00886 - 0.37 0.35 0.41 14 4152 20 0 20 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 4 0 2 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 3 0 0 3 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 223 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.51 0.47 0.55 16 4342 14 2 11 1 18
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1157 1 1 0 0 1
PDB_01260 - 0.65 0.64 0.67 16 1806 8 1 7 0 9
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.84 0.87 0.81 13 887 3 1 2 0 2
RFA_00632 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 4064 19 4 15 0 16
RFA_00636 0.80 0.86 0.75 24 3973 8 6 2 0 4
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1999 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 1935 4 1 2 1 3
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 423
Total TN 76917
Total FP 265
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 233
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 450
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.586 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.621
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00713 - 0.54 0.48 0.63 10 2000 6 1 5 0 11
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 487 9 0 9 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1159 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 1816 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 4072 6 1 5 0 11
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 4 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.