CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.870 > 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.878 ± 0.120 > 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.887 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.856 > 0.702
Total TP 149 > 87
Total TN 19649 < 19699
Total FP 39 < 41
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 7
Total FP INCONS 13 < 30
Total FP COMP 14 > 4
Total FN 19 < 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 19649
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 19
Total Scores
MCC 0.870
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.878 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.887
Positive Predictive Value 0.856
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.80 0.86 0.75 24 3973 8 6 2 0 4
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1999 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 1935 4 1 2 1 3
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 19699
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.