CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder RNAsubopt
MCC 0.508 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.084 > 0.530 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.432 < 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.609 > 0.520
Total TP 377 < 380
Total TN 76979 > 76867
Total FP 245 < 363
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 38
Total FP INCONS 220 < 313
Total FP COMP 3 < 12
Total FN 496 > 493
P-value 5.62644058675e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 377
Total TN 76979
Total FP 245
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 220
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 496
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 430 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.75 0.61 0.92 22 4162 2 2 0 0 14
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.48 0.37 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00571 0.39 0.36 0.43 9 3300 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00713 - 0.46 0.43 0.50 9 1998 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 18 1 16 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 4726 23 0 23 0 37
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - 0.37 0.35 0.41 14 4152 20 0 20 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.37 0.33 0.41 7 2468 10 0 10 0 14
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.43 0.38 0.50 13 4345 13 1 12 0 21
PDB_01194 - 0.52 0.33 0.83 5 490 1 1 0 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1166 10 0 10 0 19
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1817 13 0 13 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 2 4 0 15
RFA_00632 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 4074 6 1 5 0 13
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1882 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 380
Total TN 76867
Total FP 363
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 313
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 493
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.530 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.520
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.71 0.58 0.88 7 622 1 0 1 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.23 5 3299 17 6 11 0 20
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 11 0 11 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.14 2 932 12 2 10 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.58 0.48 0.71 12 1813 5 1 4 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.31 0.32 0.30 9 4065 21 2 19 0 19
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 5 1 1 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 18 2 13 3 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.