CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.603 > 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.095 < 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.512 < 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.702
Total TP 86 < 87
Total TN 19703 > 19699
Total FP 35 < 41
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 7
Total FP INCONS 24 < 30
Total FP COMP 1 < 4
Total FN 82 > 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 19703
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1882 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 19699
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.