CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.461 > 0.178
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.057 > 0.135 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.033
Positive Predictive Value 0.503 < 0.962
Total TP 1296 > 101
Total TN 1536316 < 1538786
Total FP 1368 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 153 > 3
Total FP INCONS 1126 > 1
Total FP COMP 89 > 1
Total FN 1755 < 2950
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1296
Total TN 1536316
Total FP 1368
Total FP CONTRA 153
Total FP INCONS 1126
Total FP COMP 89
Total FN 1755
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.55 0.49 0.61 37 34130 30 3 21 6 38
ASE_00002 0.64 0.58 0.71 42 35452 20 2 15 3 31
ASE_00009 0.44 0.40 0.47 27 26049 30 3 27 0 40
ASE_00014 0.59 0.54 0.64 57 54196 33 3 29 1 49
ASE_00116 0.24 0.21 0.29 14 31577 35 3 32 0 52
ASE_00120 0.68 0.63 0.75 59 46892 20 4 16 0 35
ASE_00121 0.46 0.42 0.50 39 45072 39 6 33 0 53
ASE_00145 0.45 0.40 0.51 44 70039 45 1 41 3 67
ASE_00154 0.41 0.36 0.45 39 65255 48 3 44 1 68
ASE_00187 0.46 0.43 0.50 49 68537 52 7 42 3 66
ASE_00196 0.41 0.37 0.46 28 31565 36 2 31 3 47
ASE_00205 0.43 0.41 0.46 37 45975 47 6 38 3 53
ASE_00209 0.50 0.42 0.59 37 43008 26 2 24 0 51
ASE_00210 0.36 0.34 0.38 22 27203 38 4 32 2 43
ASE_00213 0.21 0.18 0.24 12 27210 41 2 37 2 54
ASE_00346 0.53 0.47 0.61 46 48129 32 3 27 2 51
ASE_00359 0.51 0.46 0.57 37 42713 28 2 26 0 43
ASE_00360 0.43 0.38 0.49 25 29352 26 7 19 0 40
ASE_00417 0.43 0.41 0.45 41 54523 53 4 47 2 59
ASE_00418 0.07 0.07 0.07 5 38710 68 4 62 2 70
CRW_00016 0.48 0.45 0.52 54 77317 58 5 45 8 66
CRW_00610 0.06 0.06 0.07 5 36246 64 9 55 0 76
CRW_00613 0.59 0.50 0.70 39 34924 24 1 16 7 39
CRW_00618 0.21 0.21 0.21 13 56218 62 6 43 13 48
CRW_00633 0.50 0.49 0.51 52 63444 52 5 45 2 54
CRW_00634 0.50 0.50 0.51 47 64527 48 11 35 2 47
CRW_00670 0.45 0.43 0.47 52 70015 58 8 50 0 68
CRW_00671 0.60 0.53 0.68 62 62744 32 2 27 3 55
CRW_00672 0.43 0.41 0.45 45 72291 57 6 48 3 66
CRW_00692 0.33 0.34 0.33 31 68540 77 20 44 13 59
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00827 0.74 0.60 0.91 49 26974 7 0 5 2 32
PDB_01092 0.74 0.63 0.87 33 10115 7 1 4 2 19
RFA_00632 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 4069 10 2 8 0 12
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 2 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 1538786
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 2950
Total Scores
MCC 0.178
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.135 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.033
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34191 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 73
ASE_00009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 26106 0 0 0 0 67
ASE_00014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54285 0 0 0 0 106
ASE_00116 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00120 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00121 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45150 0 0 0 0 92
ASE_00145 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 111
ASE_00154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 65341 0 0 0 0 107
ASE_00187 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 115
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00205 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 90
ASE_00209 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 88
ASE_00210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00213 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00346 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 48205 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00359 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 42778 0 0 0 0 80
ASE_00360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 29403 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00418 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 38781 0 0 0 0 75
CRW_00016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 77421 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00610 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36315 0 0 0 0 81
CRW_00613 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34980 0 0 0 0 78
CRW_00618 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56280 0 0 0 0 61
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64620 0 0 0 0 94
CRW_00670 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00692 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 90
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00827 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27028 0 0 0 0 81
PDB_01092 0.77 0.63 0.94 33 10118 3 1 1 1 19
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16
RFA_00809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.