CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Afold
MCC 0.541 > 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.101 > 0.502 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.411 < 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.715 > 0.499
Total TP 526 < 616
Total TN 742331 > 741833
Total FP 255 < 728
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 70
Total FP INCONS 176 < 548
Total FP COMP 45 < 110
Total FN 755 > 665
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 526
Total TN 742331
Total FP 255
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 176
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 755
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.715
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 616
Total TN 741833
Total FP 728
Total FP CONTRA 70
Total FP INCONS 548
Total FP COMP 110
Total FN 665
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.43 0.43 0.44 38 45364 54 5 44 5 51
ASE_00090 0.46 0.47 0.47 47 55510 59 6 48 5 54
ASE_00135 0.45 0.44 0.45 48 63084 63 8 50 5 61
ASE_00153 0.66 0.67 0.65 49 57555 68 2 24 42 24
ASE_00215 0.54 0.51 0.57 50 48429 39 4 33 2 49
ASE_00328 0.40 0.41 0.40 46 72656 75 3 66 6 66
ASE_00361 0.51 0.49 0.53 62 75349 59 7 48 4 65
ASE_00441 0.77 0.72 0.83 81 64163 30 1 16 13 31
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 5 14 1 25
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.82 0.71 0.94 17 2260 1 0 1 0 7
TMR_00046 0.47 0.48 0.46 46 62734 61 10 45 6 50
TMR_00048 0.35 0.37 0.34 35 64876 73 9 60 4 60
TMR_00458 0.22 0.22 0.23 20 63458 76 7 61 8 73
TMR_00568 0.57 0.57 0.58 56 60629 50 3 38 9 43

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.