CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Fold
MCC 0.553 > 0.462
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039 > 0.493 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.462
Total TP 1981 < 2114
Total TN 2918978 > 2917210
Total FP 1029 < 2833
Total FP CONTRA 247 < 483
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1979
Total FP COMP 202 < 371
Total FN 2585 > 2452
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2114
Total TN 2917210
Total FP 2833
Total FP CONTRA 483
Total FP INCONS 1979
Total FP COMP 371
Total FN 2452
Total Scores
MCC 0.462
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.37 0.38 0.36 34 45357 67 6 54 7 55
ASE_00090 0.66 0.66 0.65 67 55508 43 4 32 7 34
ASE_00135 0.49 0.48 0.50 52 63086 59 7 45 7 57
ASE_00153 0.57 0.60 0.54 44 57549 73 9 28 36 29
ASE_00215 0.60 0.58 0.62 57 48424 39 5 30 4 42
ASE_00328 0.68 0.65 0.72 73 72669 43 4 25 14 39
ASE_00361 0.52 0.51 0.53 65 75343 61 11 47 3 62
ASE_00441 0.81 0.77 0.86 86 64161 24 1 13 10 26
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
TMR_00017 0.56 0.55 0.58 56 67064 45 8 33 4 46
TMR_00018 0.41 0.42 0.40 39 64522 63 14 45 4 53
TMR_00042 0.34 0.35 0.34 34 62736 68 3 62 3 64
TMR_00046 0.27 0.28 0.26 27 62732 80 11 65 4 69
TMR_00048 0.23 0.24 0.22 23 64877 85 17 63 5 72
TMR_00080 0.61 0.61 0.61 59 70403 41 10 28 3 37
TMR_00082 0.67 0.67 0.68 64 67802 37 9 21 7 32
TMR_00123 0.44 0.45 0.44 45 66328 62 10 47 5 56
TMR_00137 0.16 0.17 0.15 15 60978 90 11 71 8 74
TMR_00142 0.49 0.51 0.48 52 70767 69 13 44 12 50
TMR_00207 0.30 0.30 0.30 31 72287 76 8 64 4 72
TMR_00257 0.27 0.28 0.26 27 67058 81 14 62 5 71
TMR_00271 0.63 0.62 0.65 56 64175 41 6 24 11 35
TMR_00332 0.48 0.48 0.48 48 67061 56 14 38 4 51
TMR_00366 0.46 0.46 0.46 46 67796 65 14 40 11 54
TMR_00378 0.29 0.30 0.28 29 67792 86 19 56 11 68
TMR_00404 0.37 0.40 0.34 37 67420 82 28 43 11 55
TMR_00427 0.27 0.28 0.26 27 67424 82 18 59 5 70
TMR_00443 0.53 0.50 0.55 52 67067 49 11 31 7 52
TMR_00451 0.18 0.19 0.17 17 63444 89 19 66 4 72
TMR_00458 0.49 0.49 0.48 46 63451 56 10 39 7 47
TMR_00469 0.34 0.34 0.33 34 64518 77 10 58 9 66
TMR_00472 0.48 0.49 0.47 48 64518 67 11 43 13 49
TMR_00519 0.18 0.20 0.17 19 63079 102 18 74 10 76
TMR_00520 0.48 0.48 0.48 48 63091 61 15 36 10 51
TMR_00522 0.38 0.39 0.38 38 63089 72 15 48 9 59
TMR_00528 0.30 0.29 0.30 28 63098 74 15 49 10 69
TMR_00540 0.45 0.44 0.47 46 73438 66 11 41 14 58
TMR_00568 0.35 0.34 0.36 34 60632 66 5 55 6 65
TMR_00571 0.61 0.60 0.63 59 60632 48 5 30 13 40
TMR_00580 0.67 0.65 0.70 65 60633 40 3 25 12 35
TMR_00584 0.61 0.60 0.62 58 60981 48 3 33 12 39
TMR_00586 0.48 0.49 0.47 48 60973 63 8 46 9 49
TMR_00616 0.33 0.34 0.32 34 67054 78 16 57 5 65
TMR_00699 0.55 0.53 0.57 54 67067 45 6 34 5 48
TMR_00702 0.45 0.44 0.46 44 67066 55 15 36 4 56
TMR_00703 0.49 0.49 0.49 49 67428 56 12 39 5 50

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.