CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.553 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039 > 0.552 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.488
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.572
Total TP 1981 < 2229
Total TN 2918978 > 2917891
Total FP 1029 < 1939
Total FP CONTRA 247 < 490
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1176
Total FP COMP 202 < 273
Total FN 2585 > 2337
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2229
Total TN 2917891
Total FP 1939
Total FP CONTRA 490
Total FP INCONS 1176
Total FP COMP 273
Total FN 2337
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.488
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.70 0.60 0.83 53 45387 22 1 10 11 36
ASE_00090 0.58 0.50 0.68 50 55538 27 1 22 4 51
ASE_00135 0.44 0.35 0.56 38 63122 41 1 29 11 71
ASE_00153 0.52 0.45 0.60 33 57575 51 2 20 29 40
ASE_00215 0.24 0.19 0.30 19 48453 48 6 38 4 80
ASE_00328 0.71 0.66 0.77 74 72675 33 5 17 11 38
ASE_00361 0.56 0.41 0.78 52 75399 19 1 14 4 75
ASE_00441 0.44 0.34 0.58 38 64196 33 1 26 6 74
PDB_00571 0.76 0.68 0.85 17 3301 3 1 2 0 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 2259 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_01020 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_01073 0.81 0.76 0.87 26 4341 6 1 3 2 8
TMR_00017 0.55 0.52 0.59 53 67071 42 16 21 5 49
TMR_00018 0.48 0.48 0.49 44 64530 48 21 25 2 48
TMR_00042 0.56 0.55 0.56 54 62739 48 11 31 6 44
TMR_00046 0.56 0.55 0.57 53 62742 46 5 35 6 43
TMR_00048 0.53 0.52 0.55 49 64891 48 7 33 8 46
TMR_00080 0.49 0.50 0.48 48 70399 54 25 28 1 48
TMR_00082 0.44 0.44 0.45 42 67803 53 17 34 2 54
TMR_00123 0.66 0.53 0.81 54 66363 23 2 11 10 47
TMR_00137 0.37 0.36 0.39 32 60992 53 18 33 2 57
TMR_00142 0.51 0.50 0.52 51 70778 53 14 33 6 51
TMR_00207 0.49 0.49 0.49 50 72288 54 16 36 2 53
TMR_00257 0.54 0.49 0.59 48 67080 38 10 23 5 50
TMR_00271 0.43 0.37 0.49 34 64192 38 11 24 3 57
TMR_00332 0.53 0.51 0.55 50 67070 43 15 26 2 49
TMR_00366 0.60 0.56 0.65 56 67810 43 8 22 13 44
TMR_00378 0.65 0.60 0.70 58 67813 36 10 15 11 39
TMR_00404 0.48 0.47 0.49 43 67441 54 14 30 10 49
TMR_00427 0.56 0.52 0.60 50 67445 36 15 18 3 47
TMR_00443 0.59 0.55 0.63 57 67070 36 15 19 2 47
TMR_00451 0.34 0.34 0.34 30 63459 58 21 36 1 59
TMR_00458 0.39 0.38 0.41 35 63460 51 20 31 0 58
TMR_00469 0.62 0.60 0.65 60 64527 38 14 19 5 40
TMR_00472 0.56 0.47 0.67 46 64551 34 12 11 11 51
TMR_00519 0.38 0.40 0.37 38 63086 68 19 47 2 57
TMR_00520 0.43 0.41 0.46 41 63100 51 12 37 2 58
TMR_00522 0.46 0.44 0.49 43 63102 45 17 28 0 54
TMR_00528 0.39 0.40 0.38 39 63088 65 19 44 2 58
TMR_00540 0.48 0.48 0.48 50 73431 56 17 38 1 54
TMR_00568 0.57 0.53 0.61 52 60641 45 4 29 12 47
TMR_00571 0.60 0.56 0.65 55 60641 42 5 25 12 44
TMR_00580 0.60 0.52 0.69 52 60651 33 3 20 10 48
TMR_00584 0.61 0.57 0.66 55 60992 39 5 23 11 42
TMR_00586 0.58 0.55 0.62 53 60989 42 6 27 9 44
TMR_00616 0.58 0.47 0.71 47 67095 24 9 10 5 52
TMR_00699 0.55 0.50 0.60 51 67076 37 10 24 3 51
TMR_00702 0.52 0.50 0.55 50 67070 43 14 27 2 50
TMR_00703 0.54 0.49 0.58 49 67444 39 13 22 4 50

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.