CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.634 > 0.100
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.102 > 0.106 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.523 > 0.123
Positive Predictive Value 0.771 > 0.084
Total TP 441 > 104
Total TN 519154 > 518481
Total FP 166 < 1176
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 208
Total FP INCONS 83 < 933
Total FP COMP 35 = 35
Total FN 403 < 740
P-value 1.24019667966e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 441
Total TN 519154
Total FP 166
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 83
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.771
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 518481
Total FP 1176
Total FP CONTRA 208
Total FP INCONS 933
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 740
Total Scores
MCC 0.100
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.106 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.123
Positive Predictive Value 0.084
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.