CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNAshapes
MCC 0.553 > 0.315
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.040 > 0.341 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.433 > 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.318
Total TP 1935 > 1400
Total TN 2851153 > 2849486
Total FP 993 < 3274
Total FP CONTRA 235 < 495
Total FP INCONS 567 < 2509
Total FP COMP 191 < 270
Total FN 2531 < 3066
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1935
Total TN 2851153
Total FP 993
Total FP CONTRA 235
Total FP INCONS 567
Total FP COMP 191
Total FN 2531
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1400
Total TN 2849486
Total FP 3274
Total FP CONTRA 495
Total FP INCONS 2509
Total FP COMP 270
Total FN 3066
Total Scores
MCC 0.315
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.341 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.318
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.48 0.46 0.50 41 45369 49 2 39 8 48
ASE_00090 0.52 0.51 0.52 52 55511 54 3 45 6 49
ASE_00135 0.47 0.44 0.49 48 63093 56 4 45 7 61
ASE_00153 0.35 0.40 0.32 29 57538 88 15 48 25 44
ASE_00215 0.53 0.51 0.56 50 48426 43 2 38 3 49
ASE_00328 0.59 0.55 0.63 62 72672 45 3 34 8 50
ASE_00361 0.49 0.47 0.51 60 75348 61 11 47 3 67
ASE_00441 0.68 0.63 0.74 71 64165 33 4 21 8 41
PDB_00571 0.17 0.16 0.19 4 3300 17 6 11 0 21
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
TMR_00017 0.22 0.22 0.22 22 67063 80 10 66 4 80
TMR_00018 0.23 0.24 0.23 22 64523 79 15 60 4 70
TMR_00042 0.18 0.17 0.18 17 62741 80 9 68 3 81
TMR_00046 0.17 0.18 0.17 17 62734 85 11 73 1 79
TMR_00048 0.11 0.12 0.10 11 64874 99 16 79 4 84
TMR_00080 0.25 0.26 0.24 25 70396 79 25 54 0 71
TMR_00082 0.59 0.58 0.60 56 67802 43 12 26 5 40
TMR_00123 0.05 0.05 0.05 5 66332 97 16 77 4 96
TMR_00137 0.13 0.13 0.13 12 60979 88 20 64 4 77
TMR_00142 0.20 0.21 0.19 21 70764 98 14 77 7 81
TMR_00207 0.28 0.28 0.28 29 72287 79 12 62 5 74
TMR_00257 0.05 0.05 0.05 5 67067 93 9 80 4 93
TMR_00271 0.29 0.29 0.29 26 64172 67 12 51 4 65
TMR_00332 0.32 0.31 0.32 31 67065 67 7 58 2 68
TMR_00378 0.17 0.18 0.17 17 67797 93 8 74 11 80
TMR_00404 0.38 0.39 0.37 36 67431 75 11 50 14 56
TMR_00427 0.38 0.38 0.38 37 67431 65 13 47 5 60
TMR_00443 0.25 0.24 0.27 25 67068 75 11 57 7 79
TMR_00451 0.10 0.11 0.10 10 63444 92 18 74 0 79
TMR_00458 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63450 104 13 83 8 93
TMR_00469 0.38 0.39 0.37 39 64514 71 18 49 4 61
TMR_00472 0.18 0.20 0.17 19 64510 95 14 77 4 78
TMR_00519 0.17 0.18 0.17 17 63088 95 18 67 10 78
TMR_00520 0.22 0.21 0.24 21 63101 78 8 60 10 78
TMR_00522 0.42 0.41 0.42 40 63095 64 8 47 9 57
TMR_00528 0.33 0.32 0.33 31 63097 72 14 48 10 66
TMR_00540 0.32 0.32 0.33 33 73435 74 4 64 6 71
TMR_00568 0.41 0.39 0.42 39 60634 59 7 46 6 60
TMR_00571 0.22 0.22 0.22 22 60624 87 13 67 7 77
TMR_00580 0.27 0.26 0.29 26 60635 70 14 51 5 74
TMR_00584 0.38 0.40 0.37 39 60969 74 8 59 7 58
TMR_00586 0.38 0.38 0.37 37 60976 69 12 50 7 60
TMR_00616 0.45 0.44 0.46 44 67065 58 11 41 6 55
TMR_00699 0.27 0.25 0.30 26 67073 66 7 55 4 76
TMR_00702 0.26 0.26 0.27 26 67063 77 11 61 5 74
TMR_00703 0.29 0.28 0.31 28 67437 67 14 49 4 71

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.