CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.553 > 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039 > 0.393 ± 0.052
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.377
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.362
Total TP 1981 > 1723
Total TN 2918978 > 2917030
Total FP 1029 < 3348
Total FP CONTRA 247 < 564
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2469
Total FP COMP 202 < 315
Total FN 2585 < 2843
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1723
Total TN 2917030
Total FP 3348
Total FP CONTRA 564
Total FP INCONS 2469
Total FP COMP 315
Total FN 2843
Total Scores
MCC 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.393 ± 0.052
Sensitivity 0.377
Positive Predictive Value 0.362
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.36 0.38 0.35 34 45353 68 8 56 4 55
ASE_00090 0.53 0.54 0.51 55 55503 57 4 49 4 46
ASE_00135 0.45 0.45 0.45 49 63081 66 9 51 6 60
ASE_00153 0.67 0.68 0.66 50 57554 66 2 24 40 23
ASE_00215 0.40 0.38 0.42 38 48425 53 2 51 0 61
ASE_00328 0.41 0.41 0.41 46 72659 75 5 61 9 66
ASE_00361 0.33 0.32 0.34 41 75346 82 10 69 3 86
ASE_00441 0.77 0.74 0.81 83 64158 33 4 16 13 29
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.23 5 3299 17 6 11 0 20
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
TMR_00017 0.36 0.38 0.35 39 67049 79 17 56 6 63
TMR_00018 0.12 0.13 0.12 12 64521 93 11 76 6 80
TMR_00042 0.24 0.24 0.24 24 62735 79 9 67 3 74
TMR_00046 0.54 0.55 0.52 53 62734 54 12 36 6 43
TMR_00048 0.22 0.24 0.20 23 64866 96 16 75 5 72
TMR_00080 0.33 0.33 0.32 32 70401 67 19 48 0 64
TMR_00082 0.41 0.42 0.40 40 67795 65 19 42 4 56
TMR_00123 0.46 0.47 0.46 47 66327 57 11 45 1 54
TMR_00137 0.16 0.18 0.15 16 60971 92 19 69 4 73
TMR_00142 0.50 0.52 0.49 53 70767 66 16 40 10 49
TMR_00207 0.40 0.41 0.40 42 72286 69 9 53 7 61
TMR_00257 0.12 0.12 0.13 12 67066 89 7 76 6 86
TMR_00271 0.38 0.40 0.37 36 64163 71 13 49 9 55
TMR_00332 0.48 0.47 0.49 47 67065 53 12 37 4 52
TMR_00366 0.27 0.28 0.27 28 67791 90 16 61 13 72
TMR_00378 0.13 0.14 0.13 14 67784 109 18 80 11 83
TMR_00404 0.29 0.32 0.27 29 67420 90 24 55 11 63
TMR_00427 0.31 0.31 0.31 30 67431 74 9 58 7 67
TMR_00443 0.45 0.45 0.45 47 67056 60 15 43 2 57
TMR_00451 0.17 0.19 0.16 17 63441 88 16 72 0 72
TMR_00458 0.36 0.37 0.37 34 63453 68 11 48 9 59
TMR_00469 0.48 0.51 0.46 51 64508 66 21 40 5 49
TMR_00472 0.59 0.58 0.60 56 64526 52 7 31 14 41
TMR_00519 0.20 0.21 0.19 20 63083 97 18 69 10 75
TMR_00520 0.33 0.35 0.32 35 63080 85 13 62 10 64
TMR_00522 0.46 0.47 0.45 46 63088 65 12 44 9 51
TMR_00528 0.34 0.34 0.34 33 63093 75 13 51 11 64
TMR_00540 0.24 0.24 0.24 25 73433 82 12 66 4 79
TMR_00568 0.26 0.27 0.25 27 60617 88 12 70 6 72
TMR_00571 0.28 0.29 0.28 29 60621 84 12 64 8 70
TMR_00580 0.31 0.31 0.30 31 60624 78 15 56 7 69
TMR_00584 0.40 0.42 0.38 41 60966 74 9 59 6 56
TMR_00586 0.36 0.37 0.35 36 60972 68 12 55 1 61
TMR_00616 0.26 0.27 0.25 27 67055 83 21 58 4 72
TMR_00699 0.33 0.34 0.32 35 67053 77 12 61 4 67
TMR_00702 0.56 0.57 0.55 57 67057 52 15 32 5 43
TMR_00703 0.26 0.26 0.25 26 67426 82 9 67 6 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.