CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.553 > 0.296
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039 > 0.328 ± 0.052
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.315
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.281
Total TP 1981 > 1438
Total TN 2918978 > 2916673
Total FP 1029 < 4121
Total FP CONTRA 247 < 765
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2910
Total FP COMP 202 < 446
Total FN 2585 < 3128
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1438
Total TN 2916673
Total FP 4121
Total FP CONTRA 765
Total FP INCONS 2910
Total FP COMP 446
Total FN 3128
Total Scores
MCC 0.296
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.328 ± 0.052
Sensitivity 0.315
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.19 0.19 0.19 17 45361 82 13 60 9 72
ASE_00090 0.32 0.33 0.31 33 55504 91 4 70 17 68
ASE_00135 0.45 0.46 0.45 50 63078 74 12 50 12 59
ASE_00153 0.33 0.38 0.29 28 57534 96 15 53 28 45
ASE_00215 0.28 0.28 0.29 28 48418 83 6 64 13 71
ASE_00328 0.51 0.49 0.53 55 72667 61 5 44 12 57
ASE_00361 0.36 0.37 0.35 47 75333 94 11 75 8 80
ASE_00441 0.45 0.46 0.45 51 64147 73 3 60 10 61
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
TMR_00017 0.27 0.26 0.27 27 67061 85 12 61 12 75
TMR_00018 0.34 0.37 0.32 34 64515 80 23 48 9 58
TMR_00042 0.24 0.24 0.24 24 62737 83 11 63 9 74
TMR_00046 0.38 0.42 0.35 40 62722 90 15 58 17 56
TMR_00048 0.51 0.55 0.47 52 64870 70 16 42 12 43
TMR_00080 0.19 0.22 0.17 21 70379 108 32 68 8 75
TMR_00082 0.30 0.33 0.28 32 67782 91 23 59 9 64
TMR_00123 0.21 0.23 0.21 23 66318 95 16 73 6 78
TMR_00137 0.30 0.34 0.27 30 60965 85 25 55 5 59
TMR_00142 0.30 0.33 0.28 34 70753 96 25 64 7 68
TMR_00207 0.26 0.27 0.25 28 72276 92 17 69 6 75
TMR_00257 0.26 0.29 0.24 28 67045 100 17 71 12 70
TMR_00271 0.19 0.21 0.18 19 64156 98 18 68 12 72
TMR_00332 0.27 0.29 0.25 29 67043 96 21 68 7 70
TMR_00366 0.25 0.27 0.23 27 67778 97 19 72 6 73
TMR_00378 0.17 0.20 0.15 19 67773 107 29 75 3 78
TMR_00404 0.20 0.22 0.18 20 67416 98 13 79 6 72
TMR_00427 0.15 0.15 0.14 15 67420 98 21 72 5 82
TMR_00443 0.23 0.25 0.22 26 67043 107 10 82 15 78
TMR_00451 0.15 0.17 0.13 15 63432 103 35 64 4 74
TMR_00458 0.32 0.33 0.30 31 63443 80 16 56 8 62
TMR_00469 0.17 0.19 0.16 19 64500 111 14 87 10 81
TMR_00472 0.26 0.27 0.25 26 64516 87 16 62 9 71
TMR_00519 0.14 0.15 0.13 14 63085 101 22 69 10 81
TMR_00520 0.17 0.18 0.16 18 63075 102 28 69 5 81
TMR_00522 0.27 0.30 0.24 29 63068 94 31 62 1 68
TMR_00528 0.23 0.25 0.22 24 63081 92 28 57 7 73
TMR_00540 0.26 0.28 0.24 29 73417 98 15 75 8 75
TMR_00568 0.39 0.39 0.39 39 60625 76 15 47 14 60
TMR_00571 0.50 0.51 0.50 50 60625 71 7 44 20 49
TMR_00580 0.43 0.45 0.41 45 60615 82 7 59 16 55
TMR_00584 0.27 0.28 0.26 27 60972 91 13 63 15 70
TMR_00586 0.47 0.49 0.44 48 60967 74 19 41 14 49
TMR_00616 0.36 0.39 0.34 39 67045 86 14 63 9 60
TMR_00699 0.23 0.25 0.22 25 67048 94 15 73 6 77
TMR_00702 0.13 0.14 0.12 14 67047 107 9 91 7 86
TMR_00703 0.21 0.23 0.20 23 67411 99 22 72 5 76

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.