CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Sfold
MCC 0.553 > 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039 > 0.434 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.476
Total TP 1981 > 1611
Total TN 2918978 > 2918402
Total FP 1029 < 2057
Total FP CONTRA 247 < 284
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1489
Total FP COMP 202 < 284
Total FN 2585 < 2955
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1981
Total TN 2918978
Total FP 1029
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 2585
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.77 0.59 1.00 20 4351 1 0 0 1 14
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1611
Total TN 2918402
Total FP 2057
Total FP CONTRA 284
Total FP INCONS 1489
Total FP COMP 284
Total FN 2955
Total Scores
MCC 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.434 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.476
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.52 0.44 0.61 39 45387 31 1 24 6 50
ASE_00090 0.66 0.58 0.74 59 55531 22 1 20 1 42
ASE_00135 0.50 0.45 0.56 49 63103 42 0 38 4 60
ASE_00153 0.69 0.67 0.70 49 57560 61 2 19 40 24
ASE_00215 0.55 0.51 0.60 50 48432 37 4 30 3 49
ASE_00328 0.45 0.41 0.48 46 72676 54 3 46 5 66
ASE_00361 0.50 0.47 0.53 60 75353 57 6 47 4 67
ASE_00441 0.78 0.74 0.81 83 64159 25 3 16 6 29
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 12
TMR_00017 0.30 0.24 0.39 24 67100 43 5 32 6 78
TMR_00018 0.22 0.21 0.24 19 64542 63 15 44 4 73
TMR_00042 0.20 0.18 0.23 18 62757 63 8 52 3 80
TMR_00046 0.61 0.56 0.66 54 62753 34 4 24 6 42
TMR_00048 0.39 0.34 0.46 32 64911 46 2 35 9 63
TMR_00080 0.54 0.40 0.75 38 70449 13 3 10 0 58
TMR_00082 0.48 0.43 0.53 41 67819 38 11 25 2 55
TMR_00123 0.32 0.27 0.39 27 66360 48 7 36 5 74
TMR_00137 0.17 0.17 0.18 15 60992 78 7 61 10 74
TMR_00142 0.42 0.35 0.50 36 70804 43 5 31 7 66
TMR_00207 0.37 0.35 0.38 36 72296 65 3 55 7 67
TMR_00257 0.08 0.07 0.09 7 67080 78 7 67 4 91
TMR_00271 0.54 0.48 0.60 44 64188 33 6 23 4 47
TMR_00332 0.35 0.30 0.42 30 67089 47 8 34 5 69
TMR_00366 0.33 0.31 0.36 31 67809 68 11 45 12 69
TMR_00378 0.29 0.25 0.34 24 67826 54 7 39 8 73
TMR_00404 0.41 0.37 0.45 34 67453 52 15 26 11 58
TMR_00427 0.38 0.25 0.57 24 67486 24 0 18 6 73
TMR_00443 0.41 0.31 0.55 32 67103 35 5 21 9 72
TMR_00451 0.18 0.17 0.19 15 63465 66 13 53 0 74
TMR_00458 0.25 0.16 0.38 15 63507 32 4 20 8 78
TMR_00469 0.41 0.42 0.40 42 64516 62 11 51 0 58
TMR_00472 0.38 0.33 0.43 32 64546 45 12 30 3 65
TMR_00519 0.14 0.15 0.14 14 63089 97 15 72 10 81
TMR_00520 0.51 0.41 0.62 41 63124 35 7 18 10 58
TMR_00522 0.48 0.38 0.62 37 63130 32 9 14 9 60
TMR_00528 0.32 0.15 0.65 15 63167 18 3 5 10 82
TMR_00540 0.48 0.35 0.68 36 73483 17 2 15 0 68
TMR_00568 0.52 0.35 0.78 35 60681 18 0 10 8 64
TMR_00571 0.50 0.33 0.75 33 60682 18 2 9 7 66
TMR_00580 0.38 0.25 0.57 25 60682 24 3 16 5 75
TMR_00584 0.58 0.55 0.62 53 60990 38 7 25 6 44
TMR_00586 0.28 0.25 0.32 24 61001 54 12 38 4 73
TMR_00616 0.40 0.38 0.41 38 67068 60 10 45 5 61
TMR_00699 0.31 0.29 0.34 30 67072 61 6 53 2 72
TMR_00702 0.13 0.11 0.15 11 67090 64 6 54 4 89
TMR_00703 0.37 0.31 0.44 31 67457 44 7 33 4 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.